Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Otto Virtanen vs Ben Jones Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Virtanen vs Jones analysis and find out who is favored!
Otto Virtanen vs Ben Jones Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Virtanen 2 - 0 Jones
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Virtanen has won 46.41% of points on their second serve, while Jones has won 50%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Virtanen, in recent form, has won 52.38% of their opponent's second serve points, while Jones has won 50.48%. The same stats for first serve returns are 31.08% and 25.32% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Virtanen has saved 58.53% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Jones has saved 63.72% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Virtanen has won 56.06% of matches played (W/L 37/ 29), with Jones winning 42.59% (W/L 23/ 31) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Virtanen has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 72% (W/L 111/ 43), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 43% (W/L 15/ 20). Jones has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 54% (W/L 56/ 48), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 4).
- Player level: In the last year, Virtanen has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 55.26% of matches (W/L 21/ 17), where as Jones has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 43.18% of matches (W/L 19/ 25). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Virtanen winning 2 times and Jones being victorious 0 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Virtanen winning 4 and Jones winning 0. The last match between Virtanen and Jones was at the M15 Kouvola, 18-05-2022, First, Hard with Otto Virtanen getting the victory 6-4 6-1.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:10:30.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Virtanen and Jones have played a deciding set 0 times, with Virtanen winning 0 times and Jones 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Virtanen winning 0, and Jones 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Virtanen has played against opponents with an average rank of 235.39 while Jones has played against players with an average rank of 103.63.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Virtanen has won 52% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Jones has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Virtanen has converted 42.67% of breakpoint opportunities, and Jones has converted 34.39% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
156
Rank
109
High
22
Age
R
Plays
2
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
863
Rank
863
High
26
Age
R
Plays
L
L
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
L
Form
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
L
W
L
60% (184-124)
Career Total W/L
50% (134-136)
63% (22-13)
YTD W/L
53% (16-14)
$146,665
Career Prize Money
$0
2
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Otto Virtanen | Ben Jones |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 2 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 4 | 0 |
| Games Won | 24 | 12 |
| Aces (Total) | 10 | 8 |
| DFs (Total) | 6 | 8 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:10:30 | 1:10:30 |
| 1st Serve % | 59% (65/111) | 66% (70/106) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 85% (55/65) | 63% (44/70) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 52% (24/46) | 47% (17/36) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 60% (6/10) | 100% (1/1) |
| Return Points W% | 42% (45/106) | 29% (32/111) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (2/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-1 |
Stats 
Otto Virtanen
Player
Ben Jones
60%
(
31 of
52)
1st Serve %
69%
(
35 of
51)
3
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
5
87%
(
27 of
31)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
14 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
22 of
51)
60
Total Points Won
43
|
||||
| 6-4 6-3 |
Stats
Otto Virtanen
Player
Ben Jones
58%
(
34 of
59)
1st Serve %
64%
(
35 of
55)
7
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
3
82%
(
28 of
34)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
18 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
23 of
55)
64
Total Points Won
50
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Otto Virtanen | Ben Jones |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 63% (22/13) | 53% (16/14) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 60% (49/32) | 52% (36/33) |
| Games Win/Loss | 52% (402/371) | 52% (355/330) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 30% (3/7) | 57% (8/6) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 38% (3/5) | 0% (0/2) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 94% (16/1) | 57% (8/6) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.74 | 0.79 |
| Aces Total | 279 | 264 |
| DFs per game | 0.37 | 0.24 |
| DFs Total | 139 | 80 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:26:58 | 1:33:15 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 237.46 | 98.3 |
| 1st Serve % | 58% (1371/2360) | 70% (1261/1790) |
| 1st Serve W% | 73% (998/1371) | 77% (967/1261) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 46% (459/989) | 49% (260/529) |
| BPs Won% Total | 43% (99/232) | 31% (47/150) |
| Return Pts W% | 39% (904/2304) | 34% (655/1924) |
| Slam W/L | 40% (2/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 100% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 68% (17/8) | 40% (2/3) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 56% (14/11) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 64% (21/33) | 53% (16/30) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 75% (9/12) | 40% (6/15) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (5/10) | 56% (5/9) |
| 1st set W, W | 90% (20/18) | 81% (16/13) |
| 1st set W, L | 10% (20/2) | 19% (16/3) |
| 1st set L, W | 20% (15/3) | 21% (14/3) |
Otto Virtanen Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Filip Misolic
Player
Otto Virtanen
63%
(
99 of
156)
1st Serve %
59%
(
86 of
145)
1
Aces
17
3
Double Faults
7
66%
(
65 of
99)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
58 of
86)
46%
(
26 of
57)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
22 of
59)
56%
(
9 of
16)
Break Points Won
58%
(
7 of
12)
42%
(
65 of
156)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
65 of
145)
156
Total Points Won
145
|
4-6 4-6 6-3 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Giulio Zeppieri
Player
Otto Virtanen
77%
(
34 of
44)
1st Serve %
61%
(
30 of
49)
5
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
23%
(
10 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
23 of
49)
57
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Otto Virtanen
Player
Dominic Thiem
68%
(
41 of
60)
1st Serve %
52%
(
39 of
75)
7
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
20 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
38 of
75)
78
Total Points Won
57
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Otto Virtanen
Player
Dane Sweeny
64%
(
27 of
42)
1st Serve %
69%
(
36 of
52)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
89%
(
24 of
27)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
80%
(
12 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
6 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
24 of
52)
60
Total Points Won
34
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Marc-Andrea Huesler
Player
Otto Virtanen
57%
(
51 of
89)
1st Serve %
57%
(
49 of
86)
5
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
82%
(
42 of
51)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
35 of
49)
45%
(
17 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
34%
(
30 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
34 of
86)
93
Total Points Won
82
|
6-3 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Max Hans Rehberg
Player
Otto Virtanen
64%
(
75 of
117)
1st Serve %
46%
(
56 of
122)
1
Aces
6
6
Double Faults
15
61%
(
46 of
75)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
40 of
56)
50%
(
21 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
30 of
66)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
43%
(
50 of
117)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
52 of
122)
119
Total Points Won
120
|
6-7(4) 7-6(5) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Otto Virtanen
Player
Sebastian Fanselow
52%
(
32 of
62)
1st Serve %
52%
(
29 of
56)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
6
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
35%
(
22 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
27 of
56)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Gregoire Barrere
Player
Otto Virtanen
62%
(
34 of
55)
1st Serve %
58%
(
38 of
66)
1
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
5
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
27 of
38)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
8 of
28)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
19 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
31 of
66)
67
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ji Sung Nam
Player
Otto Virtanen
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve %
60%
(
30 of
50)
0
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
6
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
17 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
22 of
50)
57
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Seong Chan Hong
Player
Otto Virtanen
58%
(
25 of
43)
1st Serve %
56%
(
31 of
55)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
72%
(
18 of
25)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
13 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
59
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Ben Jones Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Ulises Blanch
Player
Ben Jones
72%
(
36 of
50)
1st Serve %
62%
(
31 of
50)
11
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
89%
(
32 of
36)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
20%
(
10 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
21 of
50)
61
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ben Jones
Player
Evgeny Philippov
68%
(
61 of
90)
1st Serve %
72%
(
52 of
72)
13
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
1
75%
(
46 of
61)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
38 of
52)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
31 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
24 of
72)
83
Total Points Won
79
|
3-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Joao Vitor Goncalves Ceolin
Player
Ben Jones
54%
(
43 of
79)
1st Serve %
63%
(
29 of
46)
3
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
4
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
21 of
29)
47%
(
17 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
8)
38%
(
30 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
18 of
46)
67
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Garrett Johns
Player
Ben Jones
52%
(
28 of
54)
1st Serve %
68%
(
41 of
60)
3
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
5
86%
(
24 of
28)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
31 of
41)
69%
(
18 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
22%
(
12 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
19 of
60)
61
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Evgeny Philippov
Player
Ben Jones
70%
(
74 of
106)
1st Serve %
71%
(
61 of
86)
7
Aces
19
4
Double Faults
6
76%
(
56 of
74)
1st Serve Won
85%
(
52 of
61)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
32%
(
34 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
27%
(
23 of
86)
95
Total Points Won
97
|
3-6 6-4 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Michal Krajci
Player
Ben Jones
71%
(
61 of
86)
1st Serve %
64%
(
58 of
91)
8
Aces
13
4
Double Faults
8
74%
(
45 of
61)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
42 of
58)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
14%
(
1 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
27 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
34 of
91)
93
Total Points Won
84
|
7-6(6) 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Ben Jones
Player
Adam Majchrzak
73%
(
46 of
63)
1st Serve %
53%
(
40 of
76)
6
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
80%
(
37 of
46)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
28 of
40)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
18 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
33 of
76)
78
Total Points Won
61
|
6-2 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Marek Gengel
Player
Ben Jones
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve %
80%
(
39 of
49)
8
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
94%
(
29 of
31)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
12%
(
5 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
22 of
49)
58
Total Points Won
32
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ben Jones
Player
Mees Rottgering
76%
(
63 of
83)
1st Serve %
63%
(
63 of
100)
19
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
4
90%
(
57 of
63)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
49 of
63)
80%
(
16 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
12%
(
10 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
30 of
100)
103
Total Points Won
80
|
6-7(7) 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Patrick Zahraj
Player
Ben Jones
54%
(
30 of
56)
1st Serve %
62%
(
32 of
52)
6
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
5
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
22 of
32)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
17 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
25 of
52)
64
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Virtanen Vs Jones Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
